Corrupt
California State Court Judge(s) Conspire To Keep Minor Children At Bay From Parent
Forever
San
Jose, June 25, 2016
Father
of three minor children, by virtue of a corrupt Judge L. Michael Clark’s
September 4, 2012 order, is deprived of access to his three minor children
since 2009, which continues to go on for lifetime. See http://judgeclarkandsantaclaracourts.blogspot.com/ and https://americanchildrenorphanedinthenameoflaw.wordpress.com/
 |
| Lincoln Michael Clark |
The
corrupt judge Lincoln Michael Clark, who hides his first name, using only the
initial “L”, retaliated against the father’s whistle blowing complaint by
issuing the above child custody order, which complaint raised his corruption, cronyism,
and which retaliation came in the form of abusing California Code of Civil
Procedure §391 [“Vexatious Litigant”] restriction, prohibiting father from
filing any motion, or appeal, of the divorce case child custody order without
court’s permission, which case father did not initiate.
The
corrupt Judge Clark, despite being disqualified, not just from being a judge,
but from being even called a civilized human being, forces himself to
adjudicate on father’s child custody trial, during which he gives mother’s side
one and one half weeks for her case in chief, and gives father a mere 30 minutes
for his case in chief. There are numerous other irregularities at the child custody
trial which makes the child custody trial a kangaroo trial and a nazi court
trial. The result is obvious, a order that father can never see his three minor
children, despite evidence of mother’s abuse on children presented, but not
considered by the corrupt Judge Clark. In essence gross violations of basic human
rights against father.
Father,
being now shackled as a vexatious litigant on a case he did not even initiate,
obtains and receives permission on Sep. 19, 2012 from Superior Court’s
Presiding Judge Loftus to appeal the child custody order, only to be thwarted
by the corrupt justices, Eugene Premo and Conrad Rushing, of the California
Sixth District Appellate Court, who conspire with the corrupt Judge Clark and
force father to seek a second pre filing permission, and after about a year of
waiting, on Feb. 1, 2013 deny the permission to appeal. The appellate court,
instead of being a gate keeper in ensuring enforcement of California law,
instead aids and abets the crime of not following the law.
 |
| Sixth District Justice Eugene Premo |
 |
| Sixth District Justice Conrad Rushing |
Several
years later, on May 5, 2016, the California Supreme Court settles a conflict between
lower state courts by issuing an opinion in John
v. Superior Court, 63 Cal.4th 91 (2016), case # S222726, which holds that a
vexatious litigant, appealing a lower court’s order need not seek a pre filing
permission if he/she did not initiate the lower court’s case.
Accordingly,
since the appeal on the September 4, 2012 order child custody order is still
active and pending, due to the grandmother’s own appeal, father filed a “Motion
To Vacate Feb. 1, 2013 Order To Conform
To The May 5, 2016 Supreme Court’s Opinion”. Since the intent of the corrupt
judges is to deprive father of his day in court, on May 19, 2016, an Order
bearing the rubber stamped signature of the corrupt justice of the Sixth
District Appellate Court, Conrad Rushing, denies father’s above motion stating “Respondent's
motion to vacate the February 1, 2013 order is denied as untimely”
When
Father again files a “Motion To Enforce Retroactive Application Of Supreme
Court’s Overruling Opinion And Strike Feb. 1, 2013 Order”, the same justice
Conrad Rushing denies it on June 13, 2016, this time, stating “[Father]'s
motion to enforce application of Supreme Court decision is granted. This court
dismissed appellants appeal filed on September 21, 2012, on February 1, 2013.
That decision is now final. This court is without jurisdiction to vacate that
dismissal or take any further action in that appeal”.
Ironically the judiciary paints a different picture to the legislative body that the vexatious litigant statutes is not a big deal as legitimate cases are permitted, when in reality the judiciary abuses the statute for carrying out its personal grudges and vendetta againts whistleblowing litigants who never initiated the lawsuit but are dragged into it, in the first place.
Clearly
the Sixth District Appellate Court and lower court’s judges, including L.
Michael Clark are working in concert to conspire against father’s ability to
gain access of his three minor children. It appears that the California Courts
are indirectly asking the father not to knock on its doors for justice, but to use
some other means, like the Orlando June 2016
incident style justice.
It
is unclear as to what more could the father have done to appeal the September
4, 2012 Order or make other self-represented efforts that denies his three
minor children access to their parent.
The
United States District Court Judges at the San Jose Federal Court consists
entirely of ex-California Superior Court Judges, like Judge Edward Davila,
Judge Lucy Koh, Judge Beth Freeman, Judge Jeremy Fogel, Judge Ronald M. Whyte.
The
entire judiciary, both state and federal court is flooded with corruption and
judges whose acts are outright criminal. Life-long judge appointments, no
judicial oversight, no competition (complete monopoly of judicial business),
own created judicial immunity from civil lawsuits, et al., corrupts absolute
power.
Complaints
on judicial appointments to local representatives, including ones like Senator
Dianne Feinstein, Senator Mark Leno, Assemblyman Jim Beall, Zoe Lofgren, California Attorney General Kamala Harris, et
al., have turned to deaf ears.
The
public suspicion of RICO acts between the San Jose Federal Court Judges and the
Defendant California Superior Court appears to be intensifying and may result
in a public inquiry and a Department of Justice investigation.
Please
direct your comments and queries to judicialirregularities@gmail.com
